Californian Doctor, Dr Gary Rheinschild faces possible disciplinary action and even a reprimand of his surgical licence following accusations that he contributed to 3 penis enhancement surgeries between 2003 and 2005.

According to the news, Rheinschild, 75, is accused of causing gross negligence in his treatment of these 3 men and of continuing to practice despite revealing signs of eye problems.

Discussing his case, Rheinschild’s lead attorney claims that these allegations against his visual capacity are false, as a Judge has already agreed that he is not visually incapable of performing surgery. Continuing, Rheinschild attorney believes these allegations are due to others urologists seeking to ruin his surgical reputation, and nothing more.

Are their accusations legitimate?

Penis enlargement surgeries are established for holding an element of risk, number one being their reputation for resulting in penile shortening and deformity, and it could be agreed that this is what occurred here.

As his attorney explained: ¢¬¢¬¦like any cosmetic procedure, there is always somebody who doesn’t like the results. That is part of the risk that you go through.’

Male enlargement surgery is not acknowledged as being safe or 100% effective by the Medical Association, and unfortunately for Rheinschild the media are backing claims that his reconstructions often ended negatively.

In the documentation provided by the American Medical Association, the 3 clients revealed the following.

Case One: Patient sought out Dr Rheinschild for penis enhancement surgery in late 2003, and at the time proclaimed his concerns that Dr Rheinschildseemed a bit confused. Portrayed by his staff as being ¢¬eccentric’ but the best in the country, the patient agreed to the surgery only to later find that the surgery had deformed his penis. Despite begging for reconstructive surgery to correct this mistake, Rheinshild refused to help.

Accusation No.2: 21 year old patient asks for Rheinschild in 2005. In his notes he reports that Rheinschild’s surgical hands regularly quivered and his memory was off. Over 4 weeksafter the $8,000 surgery, the skin flap stitched onto his cock ripped open and his penis quickly shrunk in size before curving. After repetitively attempting to get a follow up with Doctor Rheinschild who ignored his request the patient went to another cosmetic surgeon to acquire cosmeticsurgery on his penis shaft.

Client Three: Following male enlargement surgery implemented by Rheinschild, customer number 3 complained of pain and a large cut after skin was taken surgically removed from his back to create the skin flap. Accompanying this embarrasing situation the claimantindicated that his foreskin was becoming discoloured. Despite attempting to contact Dr Rheinschild continually, his phone calls were not returned until patient three threatened to take his case to the medical review board

Will he lose his legal rights to perform surgery?

Since 2005, Dr Rheinschildis noted for having performed 1000’s of surgeries without complication and in recognition of this history, a Judge has proclaimed against an instant cancellation of his licence.

Further disciplinary proceedings are expected to take place in February 2010.

Guaranteed Safe Penis Enlargement

The case against Dr Rheinschild may be one of thousands of reported instances where penile enlargement procedures gone wrong, but THERE ARE other much safer routes for attaining your dreams of a larger penis.

Medically endorsed by the CE, traction gismos such as the ones sold online by SizeGenetics are medically proven to permanently lengthen your penis size by 3 inches after wearing the gismo for a couple of hours everyday.

Also built from clinically-proven materials, the Size Genetics penis extender device can 100% guarantee you the training and support you need to cure peyronies disease and micropenises; correct penile curvatures by up to 70%; boost penile blood flow and cureerectile dysfunction.

For more news about the SizeGenetics clinically-proven extender, visit MaleEnhancementPlus.com